Talk:XLISP
Add topicLatest comment: 13 years ago by 216.31.219.19 in topic 1989 IOCC Entry
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the XLISP article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Untitled
[edit]Where is a good introduction to XLISP? How does it differ from Emacs Lisp programming language? --Hirzel
Rewrite
[edit]I downloaded the current version of XLISP and looked and the documentation and some related sources. I've tried to put together a more accurate picture of things. Correct me if I'm wrong on something.
This freaking language has more derivatives than Unix.
Is this still a stub? Quamaretto 20:28, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
1989 IOCC Entry
[edit]That is not an XLisp derivative in any sense. Identifying itself as XLisp 4.0 is just a joke!216.31.219.19 (talk) 00:14, 30 April 2013 (UTC)