Talk:XENPAK
Add topicLatest comment: 15 years ago by W Nowicki in topic MSA not that old
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
 | The content of Xenpak was merged into XENPAK. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. For the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Merge
[edit]I would like to point out the presence of a Xenpak page. I suggest merging the information contained in both of these pages. Also, IMHO such instances should be corrected by creating one page with the official (if there is one) spelling/capitalisation and all alternative names could redirect to this page. Of course if there are 2 entities using the same name with different capitalisation, the above will not apply. 59.95.3.247 (talk) 07:14, 17 June 2008 (UTC)Ferdi
Can we get a new picture in here?
[edit]I mean, it's a nice picture and all, but we get a better view of her rack than of the device. user:Andy_Christ
MSA not that old
[edit]"Since the standard was introduced in 1991"
I think 2001 would be more accurate. Also XENPAK is not a standard as I understand it but rather a multi-source agreement (MSA).
- Yes, I think the article says that now? Should still be writen in past tense since it has generally been superceded, I think? Also I would put X2 (Cisco) to point here too, since it used the same interface but was just a smaller version (also generally defunct or on its way out). W Nowicki (talk) 21:59, 7 May 2011 (UTC)