Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a22a32d1aeee4a3e

Jump to content

Talk:X265

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Tvaughan1 in topic x265 Copyrights and Trademarks
[edit]

The Wikipedia articles really should avoid linking to pages which don't have any actual or meaningful content. Thanks for your attention and comprehension. 186.204.29.8 (talk) 14:19, 27 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

x265 Copyrights and Trademarks

[edit]

x265 is copyrighted software, and the x265 brand is trademarked. The owners of the x265 software will pursue copyright and trademark violations, to protect the integrity of the software and the brand. It is not acceptable for anyone to set up a business or website that trades on the x265 name without a license to do so. Linking to infringing sites is a violation of Wikipedia rules. See Wikipedia:EL#Restrictions_on_linking Tvaughan1 (talk) 17:43, 1 February 2014 (UTC)Reply


x265 trademark owner is "VideoLAN, Association, 18 rue Charcot, 75013 Paris" registered at 2012-05-21. Not "MulticoreWare, Inc.", there trademark registration is pending. - see tmdn.org  Preceding unsigned comment added by Licensebot (talkcontribs) 18:20, 1 February 2014‎ (UTC)Reply

VideoLan reserved the x265 trademark in the EU, and they are helping us to defend it. But you make my point for me; you are using a trademarked term, and you are copying copyrighted materials without authorization. You are also spamming this wikipedia article in a blatant attempt to improve your web ranking and traffic. Tvaughan1 (talk) 18:33, 1 February 2014 (UTC)Reply