Talk:World Embryo
Add topic | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Plot
[edit]Is the plot really that long? Two sentences? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dragonsblast (talk • contribs) 06:05, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
- For a series with only 4 volumes, yes, there is far too much plot information. The character section and any section purely about the fictional elements are counted as part of the plot, for purposes of determining the amount of plot summary in an article. Combined, plot and character forms the bulk of the article in terms of actual prose content. As such, it is too long. The plot and character summaries should not be the main focus of the article, the real world aspects should be. See WP:WAF and WP:MOS-AM. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 06:10, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
List of World Embryo chapters
[edit]Once I get around to it. I'll move the chapters to List of World Embryo chapters. Itzjustdrama? 20:47, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
- Fair enough. Though you probably need to add additional licensing info to give it enough backing as a stand-alone list. Don't forget to leave the lead here per WP:SS. —Quasirandom (talk) 21:26, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
- Sure. Would have been close to done already, but laptop gave out. Itzjustdrama? 21:36, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
- No worries -- we're not on a deadline here. —Quasirandom (talk) 21:46, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
- Sure. Would have been close to done already, but laptop gave out. Itzjustdrama? 21:36, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
Character edits and Terminology
[edit]I can understand if you delete the Minor Character information due to it being insignificant, but why do you delete the Jinki information, updated character info and Terminology, those have merit. I could just place the Jinki types under a new section dedicated to them--Twilight Mage (talk) 19:45, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
- It is excessive, in-universe, plot information that is unnecessary. We do not have "terminology" sections in manga articles. Any series only terms can be explained, in simple phrases or a sentence, the first time its mentioned in the plot. That's all. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 23:13, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
Tags
[edit]Those tags has been there since August 2009. If its really not notable enough, why the hell is it still there? Did they just plaster in a notability tag and just run away?--99.253.110.164 (talk) 09:24, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
- I sure did. Anyways since its been licensed for an English release there is a thin reason the article still remains on Wikipedia, but it still has not established notability. DragonZero (talk · contribs) 10:29, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
- Actually checking it over, there is an Australian release, meaning an English version is out meaning there should be an English review out there in the vast internet. I'll work on it once I find some reliable sources. DragonZero (talk · contribs) 10:31, 8 February 2010 (UTC)