Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2541980d979bd4a

Jump to content

Talk:Won-G

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 8 years ago by 65.60.74.198 in topic Contested deletion

Untitled

[edit]

If the people leaving the messages (the mods) about the citations could possibly tell me or even better, help me quickly fix problems with sources it would be greatly appreciated.

Clarification

[edit]

The clarification was removed as I believe that the current sources are sufficient and the article is easily sufficient enough to stay in the system. If you feel otherwise (mods) please tell me why and what I need to fix. Thanks. Skookie5 (talk) 08:02, 24 March 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Skookie5 (talkcontribs) 03:12, 23 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Needs a rewrite from better sources

[edit]

I took quick look over the article and found little beyond unreliable sources or public relations pieces used as sources. I didn't look closely at the Career section, but it looks to be WP:SOAP as well, though with much better references.

The article needs a complete rewrite from sources that are both reliable and independent of the subject. Special attention should be paid to whatever lasting notability he may have, rather than the in-the-moment hype that drives the music industry. --Ronz (talk) 17:39, 26 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

CSD

[edit]

Further to above with user who checked sources, I agree that only PR is available for this person and there's no way this article can be of any significant notability. The current version is one approved by unknown IP once reverted by user drimes. The last trimmed version was this which is even more lacking !! A7 applies because not a single reference indicates importance of this person or notability of this person.

I think the purpose of this article with undisclosed paid editing ToS violation issues is that it may get SEO ranking or promotional/advertisement on wikipedia and therefore the criteria of G11 is even more suitable.

The article should be deleted. --Drewziii (talk) 07:00, 11 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

@Drewziii: "A7 applies because not a single reference indicates importance of this person or notability of this person." Nope, three Billboard sources are enough. Have a look at WP:A7, User:Ritchie333/Plain and simple guide to A7 and User:SoWhy/Common A7 mistakes - and, for that, matter WP:NMUSIC #2 : "Has had a single or album on any country's national music chart". If you still want to delete an article, file a debate at WP:AfD (though see previous comments). Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:42, 11 April 2018 (UTC)Reply
Hello. G11 was also indicated as a reason which still applied but I have nominated it for AFD. Many experienced users have edited this article, none of them were able to find anything notable. --Drewziii (talk) 11:11, 11 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Contested deletion

[edit]

This page should not be speedily deleted because... I believe the information is important to the victims of the fraud that this person has done. He needs to be found.  Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.60.74.198 (talk) 22:48, 11 April 2018 (UTC)Reply