Talk:Wing Sam Chinn/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Generalissima (talk · contribs) 23:30, 29 August 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: HistoryTheorist (talk · contribs) 05:16, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

Hey! I look forward to reviewing this article! Just to let you know, I am a bit busy in real life right now, so I can't promise I can get to reviewing straight away, but expect comments by this Sunday. ❤HistoryTheorist❤ 05:16, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

First Pass: The Basics

• Y Article is stable
• Y Pictures are PD and properly sourced and are relevant
• Y Article includes a clear list of references
• Y No glaring spelling/grammar, source, prose issues

When I find more free time, I will go deeper, but this first pass is a basic check to make sure that the article is worth reviewing at a deeper level.

Second Pass

• Y Copyvio looks alright
• original research check:
  • AGF on reference 4; can't easily access
  • In the second half of the first biography paragraph, do you mean to link the PCAD ref inline? It looks like you pulled info about Chinn's life there that I couldn't find in the references you provided inline.
    • Bit confused what this means; the sentencing beginning "By 1910" comes from the "Personal" section on his PCAD page, while the other two sentences come from the "Education" section. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 02:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
      • @Generalissima: Sorry, I got my numbering off, you're good :).
  • Otherwise, the article looks pretty good OR-wise.
• I made some minor copyedits, so if you want to take a look, go ahead and do so.
• Totally up to you, but I'd recommend splitting up as well as the Chinaland Restaurant on the Bothell-Everett Highway from the rest of the sentence. It may be grammatically correct, but it gets a little awkward to read (but splitting up might not sound better, your choice ).
  • Good idea; fixed. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 02:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

@Generalissima: Hey, this article is in pretty good shape and looks ready to pass as long as you intelligently respond to the minor suggestions I've made. ❤HistoryTheorist❤ 00:52, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

• @HistoryTheorist: Okiedokie, responded. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 02:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.