Talk:Windows Rally

This entire page looks fishy. It smells like it has been vomited from Redmond, Washington. No offense to the people who edited this article previously, but it sounds so... unlike Wikipedia. I did try to look at it on http://wikiscanner.virgil.gr/ but I don't see any direct evidence of M$ doing the editing themselves. Perhaps just fanboys. Can this be cleaned up to give us a NPOV on this technology? Will you please ignore me? 21:17, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Please help us by providing instances of where things are problemmatic. We, regular editors, have become used to the content that sometimes such stuff evade our eyes. Thats why we need feedback. --soum ^talk 05:19, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

The lack of criticism or real summary of Rally is a little striking here, particularly compared to most other articles about Microsoft sources. At the least, it results in an article that's less educational than it should be; at worst it's NPoV to the point of sounding like a Microsoft press release. It doesn't help that the information is unnecessarily technical. Just my opinion, but I don't think this is really a good article as is. Gattsuru (talk) 21:50, 4 January 2008 (UTC)