Talk:Windows NT processor scheduling
Add topicLatest comment: 11 years ago by 161.31.231.168 in topic Stub
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 | The content of Random boosting was merged into Windows NT processor scheduling. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. For the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Re-write
[edit]Needs re-write to make it clear what is MS Windows-specific and what is generic--MichaelMaggs 06:08, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
- Or rename to "Processor scheduling (Windows)". Jakew 22:11, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
Stub
[edit]This article is a stub and should be expanded. Some examples to explain how the priorities actually affect each other, as well as the wait time's affect, should be included. I would also like to see some info on the differences NT gives between dynamic and real time, and if the difference between "level 15" and "16" is all that much (is it nomenclature and is it actually good for a soft real time system). I know some of the answers, but not enough to actually expand the article w/ good sources and what not. 161.31.231.168 (talk) 04:16, 3 September 2014 (UTC)