Talk:Williams Cone

This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Williams Cone is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
October 16, 2025	Good article nominee	Listed
June 22, 2026	Featured article candidate	Promoted

Current status: Featured article

Volcanoes: Canada Low‑importance

	Volcanoes portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Volcanoes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of volcanoes, volcanology, igneous petrology, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VolcanoesWikipedia:WikiProject VolcanoesTemplate:WikiProject VolcanoesWikiProject Volcanoes
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Volcanism of Canada task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Mountains Low‑importance

	Mountains portal This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Canada: British Columbia / Geography / The 10,000 Challenge Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject British Columbia.

This article is supported by WikiProject Geography of Canada.

Canada
10,000

This article was created or improved as part of The Canada 10,000 Challenge - You can help!

GA review

Latest comment: 9 months ago8 comments2 people in discussion

Passed. Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 00:39, 16 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Williams Cone/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Volcanoguy (talk · contribs) 18:20, 17 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: Sammi Brie (talk · contribs) 18:37, 15 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

I have a ref question and a suggestion. It's been a while since you nominated it, so fresh eyes might be a good thing. Ping me when addressed. Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 18:49, 15 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Did you know? If you fancy doing so, I always have plenty of GA nominees to review. Just look for the all-uppercase titles in the Television section. Reviews always appreciated.

Copy changes

this north-flowing stream enters the Klastline River which flows Add comma after Klastline River for legibility.
Done. Volcanoguy 19:24, 15 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Sourcing and spot checks

Reviewed: 12, 14, 20, 22, 30

[22] Is this page number correct for Souther 1990 or Souther 1992?

No other issues.

It was supposed to be Souther 1992, not Souther 1990. Volcanoguy 19:23, 15 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Images

All images are appropriately licensed. Encouragement: Add alt text.

I don't see anything about alt text in the good article criteria. Volcanoguy 19:40, 15 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

That's why it's listed as an encouragement (it's not necessary for GA status). Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 00:20, 16 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This page was redesigned at the edge.

A page that knows where it met you.

Talk:Williams Cone

GA review

Copy changes

Sourcing and spot checks

Images