Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a24ed6bc9db0de81

Jump to content

Talk:William Spriggs

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 24 August 2020 and 4 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): 19jshi.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 13:00, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Proposed Edits

[edit]

Dear all, Hello! I plan significant revisions to this page; currently, it is simply a list of quotes. I have outlined my planned revisions in my sandbox. Please feel free to let me know what you think. Happy editing! 19jshi (talk) 22:25, 28 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hello! I have made the changes I proposed. 19jshi (talk) 14:51, 5 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Peer Review

[edit]

Article maintains neutrality throughout and is easily readable. I would suggest maybe adding a couple more images. However, over all, I do not think there are any major adjustments that need to be made. AHall08 (talk) 23:12, 28 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Next Steps

[edit]

Hi 19jshi, the edits you've made look great! I think the article looks quite polished. I have just a few things you might want to consider moving forward:

  • I would change some of the wording in "An Open Letter to Economists" to make sure you stay 100% NPOV. To me, the phrases "pointed out" and "discusses how" indicate agreement with his arguments, when it might be better to simply refer to his statements as assertions or arguments. You can go with either my interpretation of NPOV or AHall08's since I think both make sense.
  • If you are interested in expanding the article in any way, you might be able to include a section on the various points he has argued in his publications. This is totally optional, and it is up to you whether you think this would improve the article or not.

Great job. MBJAnderson (talk) 02:57, 29 October 2020 (UTC)Reply