Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
// request.cf · coarse context
A page that knows where it met you.
Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crusades, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Crusades on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CrusadesWikipedia:WikiProject CrusadesTemplate:WikiProject CrusadesCrusades
William II of Agen is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages
A fact from William II of Agen appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 29 September2025(check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that in the 1260s one Bishop William moved from Agen to the Holy Land, while another Bishop William moved from the Holy Land to Agen, leaving some historians confused as to which was which?
Latest comment: 10 months ago6 comments3 people in discussion
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. You can locate your hook here.No further edits should be made to this page.
... that in the 1260s, one Bishop William moved from Agen to the Holy Land while another Bishop William moved from the Holy Land to Agen, leaving some historians confused as to which was which?
Source: "En effet, en 1262-1263, Guillaume, évêque d'Agen, va occuper le siège patriarcal de Jérusalem; Guillaume, évêque de Lydda, est transféré à Agen. La succession de deux évêques por- tant le même nom a été une source de confusions." (Dossat 1983, p. 79)
ALT1: ... that in the 1260s, one Bishop William moved from Agen to the Holy Land while another went the other way to replace him, leaving some historians confused as to which was which? Source: (Dossat 1983, p. 79)
QPQ: - Not done Overall: Lovely idea for a double hook! Creation/expansion is recent and the articles look great. I like the first phrasing better (the repetition gives it a nicely flowing parallelism). Important, though: I only see one QPQ here, and surely a double hook needs two? ~ L 🌸 (talk) 07:42, 23 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
Oh, I see, that makes sense! Does that mean I could use this review for more than one QPQ..? I haven’t been treating double hooks that way at all, but it’s twice the checking so it makes sense… regardless, sounds like this one is good to go! ~ L 🌸 (talk) 09:55, 23 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=small}
- Not done
Lovely idea for a double hook! Creation/expansion is recent and the articles look great. I like the first phrasing better (the repetition gives it a nicely flowing parallelism). Important, though: I only see one QPQ here, and surely a double hook needs two? ~ L 🌸 (talk) 07:42, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
Oh, I see, that makes sense! Does that mean I could use this review for more than one QPQ..? I haven’t been treating double hooks that way at all, but it’s twice the checking so it makes sense… regardless, sounds like this one is good to go! ~ L 🌸 (talk) 09:55, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
