Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a25b3a6f1865a23e

Jump to content

Talk:William Grainge

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 5 years ago by MeegsC in topic DYK nomination

DYK nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by MeegsC (talk) 11:46, 16 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

William Grainge
William Grainge
  • Reviewed: Oh Sheit It's X
  • Comment: Expansion was worked in mainspace, beginning 19 April 2021. There are other possible ALTs, such as, 1. Grainge believed he wrote the first history of the Forest of Knaresborough, 2. that he was the first to make Edward Fairfax's Demonologia available to the public, 3. although he produced a goodly list of history books, he was little known during his lifetime, and so on.

5x expanded by Storye book (talk). Self-nominated at 16:03, 24 April 2021 (UTC).Reply

  • Very nice work! The article has been expanded more than five times, was nominated in the correct window of time per DYK rules, and is within policy. The supporting references for the hooks are behind a pay wall, and I am assuming they are accurate in good faith. My only issue is minor. DYK rules require an immediate citation after the hook fact. While I recognize that you cited the source a couple sentences after the 24 mile walk, we really need a citation right after that fact. I know it seems a bit redundant, but once you go ahead and cite the source directly after the hook fact in the article I can approve this. Same thing for the archaeological site sentence if you prefer the alt hook. Best.4meter4 (talk) 21:46, 13 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • You are welcome. Thank you for an interesting article. To promoting admin, the image is licensed properly and can be used on the main page, and both hooks now have citations. Either hook could be promoted.4meter4 (talk) 12:51, 14 May 2021 (UTC)Reply