Talk:Wilhelm Solheim

Untitled

So for the week 4 assignment we're supposed to write what we want to contribute to this article. I was looking through it, and I thought that the "Life and Education" part was good, although I wouldn't be opposed to splitting it in two to make it easier to read. Additionally, I felt that the "Works in the Philippines" section was split into a few blocky sections that are all really random, in my opinion. There are no citations for any of these subsections, so we can maybe start by finding some citations for these subsections. Here is my bibliography of some Solheim sources that we can dig through to add citations to back up the text in the "Works in the Philippines" section:

• Solheim, W. (1972). AN EARLIER AGRICULTURAL REVOLUTION. Scientific American, 226(4), 34-41. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/24927314
• Wilhelm G. Solheim,, "Early Bronze in Northeastern Thailand," Current Anthropology 9, no. 1 (Feb., 1968): 59-62.
• Wilhelm G. Solheim, "Pottery and the Malayo-Polynesians," Current Anthropology 5, no. 5 (Dec., 1964): 360+376-406.
• Solheim, W. G. II. 2002. The Archaeology of Central Philippines, Revised edition. Quezon City: Archaeological Studies Program, University of the Philippines.

Also, I'm not too sure if this is the right place to do this assignment, so let me know if we should be writing this somewhere else in the Talk page. --Gc14163 (talk) 07:52, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

Is there any more information on his early life, family background, etc? I feel that there is a lack of this. (Guido00 (talk) 20:46, 23 February 2018 (UTC))

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Dianax4, Gc14163, Dgoldman323, Guido00, Harveer kg.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 12:58, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Article Evaluation (Kenneth Walk)

   Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?: Yes, the info is all pertinent, not distracting.

   Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?: The article appears neutral.

   Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?: All points seem to be favored equally.

   Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?: Yes

   Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?: Yes

   Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?:  More info one early life, family background.

   Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?:

   How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?:

   How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?:  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Guido00 (talk • contribs) 21:03, 23 February 2018 (UTC)