Talk:Wiktionary

How about a criticism section?

I cannot imagine that people and academics have not been criticising the Wiktionary project. I know I have. Isn't there anything to mention in that area? Tomsintown 12:57, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

I agree. Constructive criticism is great to improve anything. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.73.151.118 (talk) 23:14, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

I have criticism. It is described as an English dictionary yet it is an American English dictionary. Standard English aka British English is the default English in 75% of countries where there is a default English. 194.223.59.136 (talk) 09:22, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

ı agree with you ~2026-32522-47 (talk) 10:29, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

Logo section - primary sources

There is a template for this subsection stating that it needs secondary sources. I could not find any on this subject and think that the primary sources are sufficient in this instance. yutsi (talk) 18:49, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

By see nolm

ADr by by by ~2026-38324-31 (talk) 15:58, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 18 July 2026

My request is to add a new word here and the word is Hatresolesym. It's not a bad word but a deep word. Hatresolesym (talk) 06:48, 18 July 2026 (UTC)

 Not done: this is the talk page for discussing improvements to the page Wiktionary. Please make your request at the talk page for the article concerned. Make your requests to add words at Wiktionary, not here. jolielover♥talk 07:37, 18 July 2026 (UTC)

"Wikitionairy" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Wikitionairy has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 August 17 § Wikitionairy until a consensus is reached. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 18:07, 17 August 2026 (UTC)