Talk:WikiIslam/GA1

GA review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Snuish2 (talk · contribs) 17:02, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

Reviewer: NorthernWinds (talk · contribs) 19:48, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

I will be reviewing this page NorthernWinds ❄️ (talk) 19:48, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, grammar, and understandability): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, lists, and tables):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.

   a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions and alt text):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Well written?

1.1

• A 2024 study by Edin Kozaric and Torkel Brekke found that while the post-revision site - I think this would be better if you wrote "A 2024 study of the site following its revision found..." NorthernWinds ❄️ (talk) 19:55, 28 September 2026 (UTC)
• It was founded by Ali Sina, an Iranian-born Canadian ex-Muslim, and originally maintained by his organization, Faith Freedom International,[3]: 162 [a] part of the counter-jihad network. - is counter-jihad network an entity or did you mean just the counter-jihad movement? NorthernWinds ❄️ (talk) 20:20, 28 September 2026 (UTC)
• As a "community-edited website", the wiki was set to be edited and modified by (registered) approved netizens.[3]: 162 - was set to be edited or is edited and modified by approved netizens? The difference is that the former implies that something changed overtime, while the latter states the state of affairs. NorthernWinds ❄️ (talk) 20:20, 28 September 2026 (UTC)
• Larsson's latest publication on the site is from 2018 where he asks readers to consult his publications from 2007 and 2013 for scholarship on WikiIslam - you are using a primary source that does not state this here. I would simply say that "in [date], [scholar name] wrote..." NorthernWinds ❄️ (talk) 20:20, 28 September 2026 (UTC)
• Translations of content into multiple languages are available -> "The site's content is available in multiple languages" NorthernWinds ❄️ (talk) 20:20, 28 September 2026 (UTC)
• Following a major revision around 2020, a study published in 2024 found that WikiIslam articles generally present how Muslim scholars have historically addressed specific questions and that internal disagreements among scholars are often included.[11]: 10  However, contemporary discussions and progressive interpretations of controversial topics are rarely represented.[11]: 10  - this doesnt cover everything written in the lead NorthernWinds ❄️ (talk) 20:21, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

Neutrality

• As used on WikiIslam, to be "critical" has meant holding preconceived negative opinions of Muslims and Islam - please attribute to the scholar NorthernWinds ❄️ (talk) 20:20, 28 September 2026 (UTC)