Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a22453adf9ea3f27

Jump to content

Talk:Widlar current source

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Hansschulze in topic Design procedure with specified currents

DC current mirror

[edit]

Reference has been moved so link is no longer valid. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.82.213.125 (talk) 20:49, 11 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Source versus mirror

[edit]

After some careful analysis of the Widlar current source, I came to the conclusion that the this circuit is called source rather than mirror because the two currents on each branch of the circuit do not match. If I try to match the currents in both branches, I obtain an emitter resistance of 0Ω which is reducing the circuit to the simple current mirror. Does all this make sense or am I saying something stupid?

ICE77 (talk) 19:43, 24 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

I get the same, even negative resistances for some configs.

Hansschulze (talk) 00:59, 6 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Design procedure with specified currents

[edit]

I tried to get IO=5uA, IR1=10uA (best error%) in LTSpice and IR2=4.997uA while IO=4.869uA. Looks to me like 129nA of base current isn't accounted for in the right place. I would prefer that IO gets 4.997uA and IR2 = IO + IQ2B. But I ain't smart enough to fix the formula.

Hansschulze (talk) 01:57, 6 August 2019 (UTC)Reply