Talk:Wide shot
Add topic| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Wide shot article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
this article is very bad and needs to be deleted —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.241.118.168 (talk) 23:18, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
Requested move 24 February 2020
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved. Seems fairly straightforward. (closed by non-admin page mover) OhKayeSierra (talk) 14:50, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Long shot → wide shot – This technique is more commonly known as a "wide shot" in everyday use. "Long shot" was only used in a somewhat jargon-y filmmaking context, and indeed many newer filmmaking books are moving more and more to just calling this a "wide shot". The current title is also easily confused with a shot taken for a long time (a long take) or confused with the everyday phrase which describes something which has a low chance of winning. Netoholic @ 22:36, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
- Support. Exactly, the current title may be confused with the phrase about something with a low chance of winning. feminist (talk) 02:54, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
A “long shot” is exactly the opposite of a “wide shot”, not the same thing
[edit]As far as I’ve ever known for decades (expertise at least in still photography) “long shot” refers to the use of a long lens, often to shoot a subject close-up but from a distance, i.e., with depth-of-field compression. This is exactly the opposite of a “wide” or “establishing” shot, which seems to be the intended topic of this article. The ‘move history’ of this article, plus it’s current lede text, seem to confuse and conflate these. The lede should be fixed to omit, or not conflate “long shot”, or clarify that it means the opposite of “wide shot” 67.185.21.25 (talk) 03:30, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note that the problem/confusion extends to the longshot disambiguation page as well. 67.185.21.25 (talk) 03:35, 3 May 2024 (UTC)