Talk:Wicked Weasel
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 2 years ago by It is a wonderful world in topic 2014 - project quality scale rating - how?
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Wicked Weasel article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 - project quality scale rating - how?
[edit]What's the process for getting this article reviewed/"graded" by one of these Wikiprojects so that its current form is what the rating is based on, and so that there can be a list of necessary improvements or suggested future editing plan? Thanks. Azx2 10:14, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
- Hi, I know it has been getting on for 10 years! But as per the current Wikipedia standards, I have rated this a "start" class. It has been a long time, but thank you for your contribution! It is a wonderful world (talk) 19:24, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class sports articles
- WikiProject Sports articles
- Stub-Class fashion articles
- Low-importance fashion articles
- Stub-Class company articles
- Low-importance company articles
- Automatically assessed Companies articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- Stub-Class Brands articles
- Low-importance Brands articles
- WikiProject Brands articles
