Talk:Wibault 9

A fact from Wibault 9 appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 2 June 2013. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Wib 9 fighter aircraft never went into production, although testing suggested it was faster than the model that preceded it?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Did you know archive/2013/June. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Wibault 9.

Wikipedia

Aviation: Aircraft

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

DYK nomination

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Not sure how worthwhile the DYK was. The DYK seemed to suggest an "oh those misguided fools making a bad decision" vibe. Sure it might have been slightly faster, but heavier and with 16% lower fuel capacity - seems like a good idea it was scrapped. Airspeed isn't everything, even on a fighter. -Danny — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.122.202.188 (talk) 18:40, 3 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

A page that knows where it met you.

Talk:Wibault 9

DYK nomination