Talk:Whitney Reed
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Tennishistory1877 in topic This is the most non-encycl., non-WP-type article I have ever read
| This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This is the most non-encycl., non-WP-type article I have ever read
[edit]At least in the third paragraph.
Has anyone actually bothered to read it? I am staggered that it has apparently been here for quite a time in that form. Hayford Peirce (talk) 21:57, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Agree with Hayford. This article needs an upgrade and more details.Tennisedu (talk) 16:30, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
- I have removed POV paragraph. If you feel this article needs an upgrade and more details, then upgrade it and add more details. tennishistory1877 (talk) 16:46, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class biography articles
- Stub-Class biography (sports and games) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (sports and games) articles
- Sports and games work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Stub-Class United States articles
- Unknown-importance United States articles
- Stub-Class United States articles of Unknown-importance
- WikiProject United States articles
- Stub-Class tennis articles
- Low-importance tennis articles
- WikiProject Tennis articles
