Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a234fa41b9bdcc36

Jump to content

Talk:Whitewash

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 10 years ago by Greenadia06


Kalsomin / Calcimine is NOT another name for whitewash. Calcimine is (more or less) a glue base with an opaque pigment added. It's virtue was cheapness, an attractive appearance and the fact that it can be removed with hot watter and scrubbing. It's main detraction is that unless removed it will cause other coats of paint applied over it to peel and fail.Saxophobia (talk) 14:57, 3 June 2008 (UTC)Reply


Whitewash is Not limewash. the whole premise of this page is wrong in the UK. LIMEWASH is made from lime and depends on carbonation. WHITEWASH is simply unburnt lime like chalk that can be washed off, hence: Whitewash. In my view the whole page needs editing and the distinction made clear, even if it means different things in different countries.--217.44.18.91 (talk) 10:32, 26 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

To me WHITEWASH is a colour which can be made from lime, but does not necessarily have to be. It can e.g. also me made with chalk, gypsum or clay. LIMEWASH is only made from lime. So I aggree with the idea that the whole page needs editing. What do others think? --Greenadia06 (talk) 11:53, 9 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

farming is not revelent to this article

[edit]

unless someone objects im deleting that section, if you like you can create a separate article about farming and quicklime —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thekiller35789 (talkcontribs) 04:01, 31 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Topic splitting into separate articles is only done where a shared-topic article is overly long and the other uses get buried. In this case, this article is short enough to nearly be a stub, so no splitting is needed, and the farming applications are closely related to the original meaning of the term. So the content you want to remove should stay here. DMahalko (talk) 12:53, 1 January 2010 (UTC)Reply


ok so you dont have to split the article but i feel that the farming section is the same as making a article about red cars and then putting in a section about blue cars. also the references do not state that soap is an additive to the white wash so until there is more references it should be removed.--Thekiller35789 (talk) 04:28, 2 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

I found this whole article interesting and useful. I think the farming bit is fine myself. However, in it it says 'A mobile whitewashing trailer is used to mix the quicklime ...'. Shouldn't this be hydrated or slaked lime, as it says earlier that quicklime is calcium oxide.Wodawik (talk) 23:18, 5 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Either can be used, the resulting paint is the same 82.31.207.100 (talk) 21:03, 14 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Please add your clarification of the quicklime vs. slaked lime point, above, to the body of the article, so that the reader is not left wondering if a mistake has been made. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.142.62.133 (talk) 05:15, 8 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

White people this, white people that...

[edit]

Even in an article about paint you have to attack white people??

Is that reference really necessary and above all relevant???

Shocked much the far-right is gaining popularity?? I wonder why...  Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.139.110.49 (talk) 18:24, 29 November 2014 (UTC)Reply