Talk:White backlash

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Sociology Low‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

South Africa Low‑importance

	South Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of South Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject South AfricaTemplate:WikiProject South AfricaSouth Africa
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following reference(s) may be useful when improving this article in the future:

Ansell, Amy Elizabeth (2013). "(Racial) Backlash". Race and Ethnicity: The Key Concepts. Routledge. pp. 17–19. ISBN 978-0-415-33794-6.
Gallagher, Charles A. (2019) [first published 1999]. "White Racial Formation: Into the Twenty-first Century". In Pincus, Fred L.; Ehrlich, Howard J. (eds.). Race and Ethnic Conflict (1st ed.). New York: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-4294-9789-6.

It is requested that an image or photograph of White backlash be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in South Africa may be able to help!
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other websites.

Upload

It is requested that an image or photograph of White backlash be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in the United States may be able to help!
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other websites.

Upload

The article has a left wing bias

Latest comment: 7 months ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Wikipedia should be neutral. We can't argue with convinced ideologues on both sides, they won't listen anyway, but we need to be neutral here. Candidyeoman55 (talk) 23:56, 25 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Are there specific changes you would like to see in this article? -- LWG ^talk ^(VOPOV) 00:51, 26 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

This is the second time in quick succession you’ve added Template:POV to this article. The guidelines for usage of that template ask that editors “explain on the article's talk page why [they] are adding this tag, identifying specific issues that are actionable within Wikipedia's content policies.”

At the first attempt, your edit summary read as follows: This article needs to be neutral. This article seems to have a left-wing bias.

Your edit was rightly reverted by @StephenMacky1 with this summary: Drive-by tag. You need to justify it on the talk page.

You then manually reverted your edit with a near-identical summary: This article seems to have a left-wing bias. I've left a message at the talk page.

On the talk page, you started a topic titled “This article has a left wing bias”, of which the first sentence reads “Wikipedia should be neutral.”

This does not constitute explaining “why you are adding this tag” or “identifying specific issues that are actionable within Wikipedia's content policies.” You’ve now used the same (minimally rephrased) two lines three times: to summarise an edit reverted for being unexplained, to summarise your reinstatement of that edit, and to “explain” the edit itself!

Template:POV allows the template to be removed when “it is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given.” It appears we have nothing to discuss. Foxmilder (talk) 11:21, 27 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

A page that knows where it met you.

Talk:White backlash

The article has a left wing bias