Talk:Wet electron

Chemistry Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Physics Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comments

Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments3 people in discussion

This article fails to explain what a "wet electron" is. It also fails to explain that the term "wet electron" is not a universal term, but referred to in a small number of papers referring to certain electron molecule interactions. Some evidence is required before the wet electron = saddle point argument can be made. The link to this article from Saddle point should probably be removed until this article is clarified. --pflodo 14:29, 2005 May 18 (UTC)

Just confirming it isn't actually a hoax: . Pretty obscure though. Rd232 22:24, 19 August 2005 (UTC)Reply

Here's the actual reference the webpage above refers to: Science, 308, 1154 (2005). I haven't read it but I will try. Jas131 11:37, 3 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

I've expanded the article to highlight more typically studied aspects of wet electrons. Zwontoni (talk) 07:58, 23 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

A page that knows where it met you.

Talk:Wet electron

Comments