Talk:Westminster Chorus
Add topicLatest comment: 18 years ago by Niremetal
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Westminster Chorus article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1 |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
I added the neutrality dispute tag because it's clear that the last paragraph in the article is written from a first-person point of view, it's just been painfully side-stepped by replacing the word "we" with "the chorus". If someone from within the group added this paragraph, just quote yourself (or better yet, the director) and be done with it. (21:33 EST) Bobagat
I have added a tone tag to the history section because in most of the paragraphs, the tone of voice & style are not in line with an encyopedia. See the AOH, Masters, and VM wiki entries for comparsion. (A gold medal chorus should have a gold medal worthy wiki entry.) Jon 14:43, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- This entry reads like an advertisement, and needs serious, serious cleaning up to make it even close to encyclopedia-quality. In the meantime, the history section (with the possible exception of the paragraphs on them winning silver and gold in '06 and '07) it a clear violation of WP:SOAPBOX and should be deleted until a rewrite can be done. Niremetal 16:00, 29 October 2007 (UTC)