Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a25fa49ecb63b86e

Jump to content

Talk:Wellspring camps

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 9 years ago by 122.99.121.110 in topic This article reads like an advert

== RFC ==How much does it cost?

I've added some tags to this article, as it originally read rather like a PR piece for the company.  Would appreciate some thoughts on whether the article still warrants the tags. --Oscarthecat (talk) 16:00, 29 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

This is a really well written and researched article. It's just not an encyclopedia article. It's a fact-based brochure for Wellspring. I know there are articles on many many private companies on Wikipedia, but this is different. It doesn't talk about company history, ownership, structure, income, market share, or anything providing perspective on how it fits into the industry as a whole. Considering that the generic article Fat camp is short, not very well written and has few references and Weight loss resort is a stub, it would make sense to combine this article with the Fat Camp article and try to make it more general, but retain all the great facts and statistics as it does provide information about the capabilities of a "fat camp." --Jaywilson (talk) 11:12, 10 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

This page is a business listing, complete with bias reviews. Is Wikipedia now a forum for businesses? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.191.17.39 (talk) 22:02, 26 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

This article reads like an advert

[edit]

This article reads like an advertisement. it is not objective, and looks like it may have been written by someone close to the company. not quite sure how to flag this.--122.99.121.110 (talk) 18:20, 10 January 2017 (UTC)Reply