Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a24e8d4b585f7f3b

Jump to content

Talk:Weight loss

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Should we split into two articles? Intentional and Unintentional?

[edit]

Shouldn't this article be split into two? One for "intentional" and one for "unintentional"?

  • The two subjects have nothing to do with each other.
  • No reader will be interested in both at the same time.
  • The "Myths" and "Health Effects" top-level headings do not apply to "unintentional".

I seem to recall this proposal being discussed previously but I can't see any discussion of it here. 49.186.157.162 (talk) 10:57, 31 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

I support this breakup 198.27.180.105 (talk) 07:23, 18 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
[edit]

Hi, I'd like to suggest adding a new resource under External Links: Scientific Guide to Natural Weight Loss (Backed by Research)

This is an evidence-based Google Site summarizing natural strategies for weight management, fully referenced and accessible to general readers.

Thanks for considering! Publichealthstudies (talk) 10:33, 4 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

It's low quality spam, it will never get published as it is. 10mmsocket (talk) 10:51, 4 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for the feedback. I understand the importance of maintaining high standards for Wikipedia. I’ll work on improving the quality and neutrality of the content. My intention is to provide helpful, evidence-based resources on sustainable weight management—not promote any commercial product or site. If there’s any specific area you'd suggest enhancing to meet Wikipedia's criteria, I’d be grateful for guidance. Publichealthstudies (talk) 11:23, 4 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
" I’ll work on improving the quality and neutrality of the content" implies that it is your website. In that case see WP:COI. You should *never* add it to Wikipedia. 10mmsocket (talk) 11:29, 4 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
Please forgive me for the words I have used because my English is not that good. If you have any problem with the suggestion I have given, I would like to apologize and if you can tell me how I can solve it, it would be good. Publichealthstudies (talk) 11:38, 4 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
You can solve it by removing your website link above and never posting it again on Wikipedia. 10mmsocket (talk) 11:39, 4 August 2025 (UTC)Reply