Talk:Wedlease
Add topicLatest comment: 6 years ago by 73.88.59.121 in topic WaPo did not introduce concept of "wedlease"
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 13 April 2016. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
There are two major issues with this page: the Washington Post article is merely an opinion page. The NPR reference is a blog (also opinion). Can those be used as legitimate sources to justify this so-called "wedlease" thing? Sounds to me like someone with an agenda created this page. How does one vote to have this article speedily deleted as being a fake?Ladycascadia (talk) 01:16, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
- There are no speedy deletion criterion that can be applied to this article. You can nominate it through either the WP:Prod or WP:AFD process. GB fan 02:03, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
WaPo did not introduce concept of "wedlease"
[edit]There's at least one sci-fi novel where the discussion of renewing a marriage contract term (although the term "wedlease" isn't used, I think). I can't think of the title(s), but someone reading this might? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.88.59.121 (talk) 20:23, 21 May 2020 (UTC)