Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a230714d6e64a40c

Jump to content

Talk:Web of Things

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 5 years ago by Alkis0 in topic Merge with Internet of Things?

Comments

[edit]

This article is too biased on the vision of webofthings.org guys. The term "web of things" is somehow prior art and cannot be limited to the vision of a RESTful interconnection of object. I cite at least two previous works in the field that coined the term "web of Thing" without limiting to REST services. Web of things vision cannot let aside web services languages and tools.

Davide Carboni,Pietro Zanarini Wireless Wires: Let the Users Build the Ubiquitous Computer In Proc. of MUM 2007 - 6th Int. Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia. ACM Press. 2007

and

B. Traversat, M. Abdelaziz, D. Doolin, M. Duigou, J.C. Hugly, e E. Pouyoul, “Project JXTA-C: Enabling a web of things,” 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS’03), 2003, pag. 282.

References were added.


93.144.144.181 (talk) 11:07, 2 March 2010 (UTC) Davide CarboniReply

Merge with Internet of Things?

[edit]

Could this article be merged somehow with Internet of Things? Pdxuser (talk) 21:36, 29 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

I'm not sure that would be a good idea. In the research community, we tend to see the WoT as distinct from IoT. You can see this in the fact that there are WoT workshops/Symposia etc separate from IoT venues. I think also that the WoT community tends to define itself as "more than" or "different from" IoT. So I'd vote to keep a separate WoT page. Rodgerlea (talk) 17:21, 8 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

I also agree with the previous comment. From the standardization point of view, WoT related topics are also not discussed in Internet standardization groups but Web standardization groups.  Preceding unsigned comment added by Egekorkan (talkcontribs) 14:19, 8 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

I also agree, it should be merged.  Preceding unsigned comment added by Alkis0 (talkcontribs) 15:23, 12 April 2021 (UTC)Reply