Talk:WebSub

Requested move 7 June 2017

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved  — Amakuru (talk) 10:02, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

---

PubSubHubbub → WebSub – Latest version of the spec is now called WebSub, and published officially by W3C at https://www.w3.org/TR/websub/ "WebSub was previously known as PubSubHubbub." Tantek (talk) 21:57, 7 June 2017 (UTC) --Relisting. Andrewa (talk) 02:29, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

• Relisting comment: No case made above. The official name doesn't count for much. Is there a change in the common name already? Or is the newer version perhaps different (and notable) enough to justify a new article? Andrewa (talk) 02:29, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
• Support. Not that I dug too deep into analysis, but casual gsearch shows that "WebSub" has been in enough circulation since 2016, and the fact that it's published by w3c is good enough for me. This isn't so well-known spec to justify nit-picking into common name vs. official name. No such user (talk) 15:41, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Untitled

I can not believe this! Instead of deleting it you shoud add what you missed - what arrogance! That is the reason I will not gove one penny this year! Be proud, Fastily! i am proud fastily! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:2000:f226:7c00:3967:8111:d033:b642 (talk • contribs)

...and that's their only contribution to date, 15:53, 4 February 2015. I guess it relates to this PROD 10:45, 31 August 2011. Andrewa (talk) 02:41, 15 June 2017 (UTC)