Talk:Weather forecasting/GA1

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

GA Review

It has taken a while, but I believe this article has enough information and references (finally) to achieve GA. All reviews and comments are welcome. Thegreatdr (talk) 00:08, 28 May 2008 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

I've made a number of changes over the last few days, mostly copy-editing. After also removing a small number of questionable statements, this article meets the requirements for a Good Article! Good job!

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Farside6 (talk) 21:34, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.