Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
// request.cf · coarse context
A page that knows where it met you.
Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Merseyside, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Merseyside-related articles. In so doing it works and collaborates with its mother project WikiProject UK Geography. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Please also feel free to join in the discussions on the project's talk page.MerseysideWikipedia:WikiProject MerseysideTemplate:WikiProject MerseysideMerseyside
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
This editor continues to manipulate edits in the Liverpool area. He has removed this text "Waterloo holds the postcode "L22" and adjoins Blundellsands and Crosby to the north and Seaforth to the south and is a northern suburb of the city of Liverpool" by stating it is unsourced. What is unsourced? That it is a northern suburb of Liverpool? that can be altered perhaps..............What about L22 POSTCODE? you think that is not true? What about adjoining Blundellsands and Crosby? You think that is unsourced? Cut the fony edits please JzaDmcm2008 (talk) 23:53, 4 August 2008 (UTC)Reply
The perfect riposte to someone you believe is removing information you think should be in the article because they say it is unsourced, is to provide a source. Per WP:V Jza did nothing wrong removing unsourced material, "material challenged or likely to be challenged, and all quotations, must be attributed to a reliable, published source".
It would probably be worth applying WP:UKCITIES and tweaking a few subheadings in the article. For instance, the information of the settlements surrounding Waterloo etc could go in a new 'geography' section. That could be sourced and the unimportant information about the postcode could be got rid of. Nev1 (talk) 00:50, 5 August 2008 (UTC)Reply
