Talk:Waterfront UTC
Add topic | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parking a draft edit
[edit]This un-referenced text was added then removed for reasons that are not obvious ClemRutter (talk) 17:26, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
Quotes from Ofsted
[edit]…senior leaders and governors had an overgenerous view of the quality of education provided by the school.
Governors and leaders have not demonstrated that they have the capacity needed to secure the improvements needed. Actions they have taken have been too slow, ineffective or have been too recent to have had sufficient effect.
Leaders have not been effective in establishing a culture of high expectation since the UTC opened in September 2015.
During the first two years of the school, some teachers were never observed teaching by senior leaders; others did not have a clear line management system. Over time, leaders had not identified areas where teaching has not been effective enough because they had the impression that it was better than it was.
Over time, governors and previous senior leaders have failed to support staff at all levels to do their jobs
ClemRutter (talk) 17:26, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
- George, Martin (4 May 2018). "A fifth of UTCs inspected by Ofsted are now in special measures | Tes News". www.tes.com. Retrieved 17 June 2018.
Copy edit needed
[edit]Text here relating to 2018 is written in the future tense! The sentiment seems fine, at the moment the quality assessment looks optimistic.ClemRutter (talk) 00:27, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
- Agreed. I've undone the damage by the anonymous editor. Wire723 (talk) 08:49, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
 | The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|