Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a22852ab9a611dfc

Jump to content

Talk:Water gap

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 13 years ago by 199.115.12.254 in topic Cumberland Gap Removed

Cumberland Gap Removed

[edit]

The Cumberland Gap of the US states of Tenessee, Kentucky and Virginia has been removed. It is not a water gap, but rather a topographic saddle in the Cumberland Mountain ridge. Such saddles and passes in the central and southern Appalacians are also locally called "gaps". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.115.12.254 (talk) 16:18, 29 May 2013 (UTC)Reply


Railways/Railroads

[edit]

Is it really necessary to include the "(non-US: railways)" bit? I don't care whether you call it railroads or railways, but to go out of the way to include both terms strikes me as unnecessary and completely irrelevant to the article, and to include BOTH terms for any word which has a slight variation in American English and British English would probably make every Wikipedia article about 50% longer...strikes me as a bad habit to start. Hamiltondaniel (talk) 08:55, 9 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Mountain pass

[edit]

It might be useful if the lead of this article discussed how a Water Gap differs from a mountain pass. Otherwise I'm wondering if the articles should be merged? —Sladen (talk) 15:05, 2 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

They are not the same: a pass is a saddle-shaped feature with no water in it (not at the top), while a water gap is a valley containing a watercourse. Can you think of a better way of explaining this in the lead para? Richard New Forest (talk) 20:52, 2 December 2008 (UTC)Reply