Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a233668018790555

Jump to content

Talk:Warren Kilbourne

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Launchballer in topic Did you know nomination
[edit]

https://www.newspapers.com/image/182959371/?match=1&terms=warren%20kilbourne

https://www.newspapers.com/image/188821474/?match=1&terms=warren%20kilbourne

BeanieFan11 (talk) 01:49, 25 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

GA review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Warren Kilbourne/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: BeanieFan11 (talk · contribs) 17:33, 25 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: Gonzo fan2007 (talk · contribs) 02:02, 27 April 2025 (UTC)Reply


I'll do this one. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 02:02, 27 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·

Comments

[edit]
  • "tupe" should be "type"
  • with the varsity in 1937 and 1938 I think "team" should be added after "varsity"
  • I would link 1939 NFL Championship Game
  • References:
    • All appear consistently formatted and appropriate for what is being cited
    • Spot checks: 2, 5, 7, 11, 15, 17

Nice work. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 03:05, 27 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Launchballer talk 12:33, 16 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

  • ... that Warren Kilbourne led a strike against a professional football team because he was not paid for participation in a charity game?
5x expanded by BeanieFan11 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 350 past nominations.

BeanieFan11 (talk) 22:14, 2 May 2025 (UTC).Reply

  • I will review this nomination. – Editør (talk) 20:53, 26 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
  • The article is new enough (expanded 5x on 25 April 2025 and promoted to GA on 27 April 2025), is long enough (3273 characters of prose), has no sourcing/copyright issues (per GA review), and is presentable (per GA review and readthrough). The hook is cited, short enough, and interesting. QPQ is done. I approved the hook. – Editør (talk) 21:04, 26 May 2025 (UTC)Reply