Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2343a527963610f

Jump to content

Talk:Walrus

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 6 months ago by MPF in topic Plural "walruses" or "walrus"?

Good articleWalrus has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 10, 2007Good article nomineeListed

Dominance

[edit]

Walrus use their tusks to both establish and maintain their dominance within their social groups. Males will use their tusks while fighting with one another to become the dominant male. Once their dominance is established they use their tusks in a new way to stay the dominant male. If a challenger approaches the dominant male they will prop themselves up and point the ends of their tusks at the challenger to try to intimidate them. If the challenger is intimidated then the altercation will end, but if the challenger does not then a fight will ensue between the two and the winner will be the dominant male form that point on in the group.

Vocalizations

[edit]

Walruses can produce many different sounds. They can even whistle. Something should be said about this in the article. But I can't just use this [] as a source, now can I? 2601:18A:C500:7170:7565:E488:64D5:7362 (talk) 20:39, 17 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Correct, that is not a reliable source UtherSRG (talk) 13:54, 31 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
What would be a reliable source for walrus whistling? 2601:18A:C500:7170:F5E0:768B:7544:1B35 (talk) 10:23, 3 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
You could check this list. UtherSRG (talk) 11:59, 3 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
Will this ↓ suffice? It's from National Geographic.
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/travel/article/the-isolated-alaska-island-where-the-walrus-sing
2601:18A:C500:E830:9F1:D0AC:3A11:C497 (talk) 03:09, 11 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Plural "walruses" or "walrus"?

[edit]

The lead section uses "walruses" and "walrus" interchangeably as the plural of "walrus". I think it should be changed to "walruses" throughout, for consistency and because (in my experience) "walruses" is much more common. 🦬 Beefaloe 🦬 10:18, 27 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Both 'walrus' and 'walruses' are acceptable as plural; see refs just added. - MPF (talk) 23:09, 19 January 2026 (UTC)Reply