Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a236e1880fea34fc

Jump to content

Talk:Wacko

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Timur9008 in topic Coverage

Fair use rationale for Image:Wack0000.png

[edit]

Image:Wack0000.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 03:06, 12 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Coverage

[edit]

@Waxworker: I see only 2 pieces of obviously non-trivial coverage. Coverage in Play Meter does not, IMO, rise to that level, and only has a sentence or two of independent commentary. Found anything less weak as a 3rd source? I'm still kinda on the fence about this. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ () 15:56, 28 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Zxcvbnm: - That's everything I found on Archive.org - I found this short retrospective coverage From Gamasutra/Game Developer with a cursory search on Google, but nothing else other than brief mentions of the game in reviews of Midway Arcade Treasures 2, which includes the game. Waxworker (talk) 16:12, 28 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
The Game Developer source does seem like SIGCOV as well, so I'm gonna call this one notable. Thanks for the additional source. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ () 16:16, 28 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
I found 2 additional (but short) sources as well. Timur9008 (talk) 12:06, 29 July 2025 (UTC)Reply