Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a226406f994ea53e

Jump to content

Talk:WXOU

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Tearaway in topic Unbalanced opinion

Unbalanced opinion

[edit]
In actuality, WXOU really sucks.[neutrality is disputed] Classical music and the occasional jazz notwithstanding, WXOU has a highly developed talent for consistently playing the most insufferable crap ever recorded, with a consistency and efficiency to rival the United States Army. Entire graduating classes have reported [citation needed] devoting as much as 15% of their time to planning station sabotage to stop the horrid pseudo-music broadcasts blasting through the Oakland Center.

I put back this critical opinion because, while it may be POV, it is relevant opinion of, at least, the author, and possibly a significant proportion of the student audience. Besides, I like the way it is said, as it seems to describe a lot of student operated radio. Simply removing the paragraph makes the article poorer. I think leaving it makes the article better. The article could be made better still if the other side was also presented, by someone who likes listening to the station, at least some of the time. Because the above paragraph tells me the critic who wrote this does like listening to the station but is in denial about that. I want to understand why. -- Cameron Dewe 21:50, 29 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Like most any college station, station staff and the college listening audience are very volatile with every academic year seeing a significant portion of the respective bodies incoming freshmen or leaving as graduates. In that since, this opinion above is not worth including as-is. Possibly, it could be of interest if cited in a published source somewhere as it could then be dated to that time's staff and programming as well as intended listening audience. Tearaway (talk) 19:08, 31 May 2013 (UTC)Reply