Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a21c59287903f814

Jump to content

Talk:WWVB

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 11 months ago by 174.216.148.196 in topic Propagation

Antenna question

[edit]

What kind of antenna is used for WWWVB? How high are the used masts?

from https://www.nist.gov/pml/time-and-frequency-division/time-distribution/radio-station-wwvb
"WWVB uses two identical antennas that were originally constructed in 1962, and refurbished in 1999. The north antenna was originally built for the WWVL 20 kHz broadcast (discontinued in 1972), and the south antenna was built for the WWVB 60 kHz broadcast. The antennas are spaced 857 m apart. Each antenna is a top loaded monopole consisting of four 122-m towers arranged in a diamond shape. A system of cables, often called a capacitance hat or top hat, is suspended between the four towers. This top hat is electrically isolated from the towers, and is electrically connected to a downlead suspended from the center of the top hat. The downlead serves as the radiating element."
174.216.148.196 (talk) 14:57, 18 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Problem with receivers in 2012

[edit]

My understanding is that there was a problem exposed by a change in modulation in 2012. http://ka7oei.blogspot.com/2013/02/did-nist-break-bunch-of-radio.html 174.25.57.105 (talk) 00:10, 17 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Propagation

[edit]

Is the increased propagation distance at night due to skywave propagation? ZFT (talk) 21:49, 2 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Ground wave propagation hugs the earth and can reach over the horizon. Skywave is not unheard of at 60 Khz, but the low frequency was chosen specifically to avoid skywave. This is because the speed of light radio signal delay would vary wildly with skip conditions fading in and out.
I'm positive from my own experience that time signals like WWVB work better at night, and NIST propagation maps published online bear this out, but this may be because of a reduction of interference on these frequencies rather than some kind of nighttime enhancement. I can't find a straight answer I trust. 174.216.148.196 (talk) 15:19, 18 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on WWVB. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:55, 22 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Closing soon?

[edit]

There is an article Time running out on atomic-clock station in Fort Collins claiming that "The National Institute for Standards & Technology based in Boulder may close its time-signal radio station in Fort Collins [...] as part of agency-wide proposed budget cuts". There is a similar article at NPR.

Trump has proposed to cut the budget of the NIST from $954 million to $629 million.

Is it too early to mention that on this page?

--The very model of a minor general (talk) 22:39, 12 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Done, with a "horse's mouth" reference. Jeh (talk) 12:24, 13 September 2018 (UTC)Reply