Talk:WUPHF.com

Excellent!

I think it's great the way the article talks about WUPHF.com and all its investors without ever once mentioning what the heck WUPHF.com does. Keep the reader guessing! --Captain Infinity (talk) 03:49, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

Article needs to be marked as unreliable, unsourced

After examining this encyclopedia article, it became clear that it is almost all unsupported information. WP allows information in its article abstracts/ledes to appear without inline citation, because it summarises material with citations in the main body. But the information in this lede, in largest part, is not sourced in the main body. The two references that are appended support only the two sentences of the Reception section; despite this limited connection of material to source, readers are given no warning of the potential unreliability of the content (by WP's own standards). This is another case of WP editors boldly flaunting WP policy, and presenting an article with "just trust us" not linked to source as WP policy demands, and doing so with no warning. Readers deserve WP:OR and strong referencing tags at the head of this article until most of its content is sourced. In short, another article that violates WP policy, and so is not encyclopedic by WP's own standards. 2601:246:CA80:3CB5:A456:D658:3132:C205 (talk) 15:02, 25 August 2018 (UTC)