Talk:WLOS/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Arconning (talk · contribs) 11:11, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

I will be reviewing this article, comments will probably be finished in the next 72 hours! Good luck to the editors! Arconning (talk · contribs)

@Sammi Brie This'll be the comments, hope they can be addressed! Arconning (talk · contribs) 17:30, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

• @Arconning: Thanks for the review. I've responded and made a few changes.
  • @Arconning: Oops. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 02:48, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
    • @Sammi Brie: Everything seems good, congrats on the new GA! Arconning (talk · contribs) 6:43, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

Prose and MoS

Lede

• Well written, no issues.

History

• Hyperlink 1948 freeze to Federal Communications Commission#Freeze of 1948
  • Done
• WSKY was out of the contest by August 1953,, "out of the contest" kind of informal? Would like to know an explanation :)
  • Fixed. Informality tends to crop up from time to time in my work...
• By July, work was under way on the Mount Pisgah transmitter facility, and a September 18 start date goal had been set;[13] WLOS-TV had signed for affiliation with ABC and the DuMont Television Network.[14], what year? If it's in 1954 you could use By July of the same year... or specify.
  • Fixed with mention earlier.
• Citizen-Times option,..., he Citizen-Times option through his other broadcast property,..., italicize Citizen-Times?
  • I am referring to the company, not the newspaper of the same name, which it owned.
• AnchorMedia, mentions of the company should be spaced into "Anchor Media" on the sources given ([36] and [37]).
  • I will object because the papers cited are in the wrong. The company's own logo CamelCases this name. Trade journals do too.
• It also was something of a consolation prize;, outmuscled, informal but would like to hear a reason why this is so.
  • Changed.

Programming

• It also was initially the smallest of the three TV newsrooms in the region., change to it was also.
• a news bureau in Spartanburg., hyperlink Spartanburg.
  • These two fixed.
• AnchorMedia, mentions of the company should be spaced into "Anchor Media."
  • See above.

Technical information

• FCC, hyperlink.

References

• Add access dates on refs, [1], [3], [43]
  • [1] is generated by infobox. [3] is technically a "print" source that does not need accessdate.
    • Fair enough.
• Would be nice to link refs [55], [66]
  • [55] and [66] were in unlinkable NewsBank full-text databases. In the time since this article was written and even since this was nominated, GenealogyBank (a NewsBank sister site) has added this paper full-run, so this is now possible.
    • Got it.
• No original research.

Spotchecks

• Manual checking, earwig, both shows nothing. Pass.

Images

• All images have proper licenses and captions.
• No copyright violations in the images.
• Would be nice if we put some images of the notable former on-air staff on the Programming section.
  • I've never had this floated at me, and while it might work for a few articles where the people had longer stays at the station or became really famous (e.g. maybe Tom Brokaw at KTIV), it really doesn't with this crew.

Misc.

• Article has no ongoing edit war, stable.

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.