Talk:WFGX
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 18 years ago by Goeverywhere in topic No Coverage
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the WFGX article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No Coverage
[edit]I changed the article to reflect that the station is still not available in Mobile, Alabama, the market's largest city. The article previously said that Comcast would probably add before the Sept. 4, 2006 launch of MNTV. Goeverywhere 05:25, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
- Well that was unsourced speculation anyway. Morgan Wick 23:54, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
- Who is writing this crap that the station "has a good signal" in Mobile? It can't be seen in Mobile and is unavailable on local cable or satellite. Is this wishful thinking on the part of a Sinclair employee? I'm changing. Goeverywhere 17:29, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class television articles
- Low-importance television articles
- Start-Class Television stations articles
- Low-importance Television stations articles
- Television stations task force articles
- Start-Class American television articles
- Unknown-importance American television articles
- American television task force articles
- WikiProject Television articles
- Start-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- Start-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- Low-importance American television articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- Start-Class Florida articles
- Low-importance Florida articles
- WikiProject Florida articles


