Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a23f2296db12cf74

Jump to content

Talk:WEDU

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 2 months ago by LunaEatsTuna in topic GA review

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Bruxton talk 21:30, 30 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

5x expanded by Sammi Brie (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 684 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Sammi Brie (she/her • tc) 19:28, 21 April 2024 (UTC).Reply

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.
Overall: Epicgenius (talk) 16:54, 22 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

GA review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:WEDU/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Sammi Brie (talk · contribs) 17:24, 21 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: LunaEatsTuna (talk · contribs) 23:26, 10 April 2026 (UTC)Reply


I will review this within one to two weeks. :) ❧ LunaEatsTuna (talk), proudly editing since 2018 (and just editing since 2017) – posted at 23:26, 10 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Copyvio check

No copyright concerns to speak of.

Lead
  • Wikilink Tampa, Florida in the infobox.
    • We generally don't link in the city field of Infobox television station if it is linked in the Location field.
Early years
  • Wikilink St. Petersburg.
    • It is wikilinked on first mention.
  • "Briefly called WFCE in the local press, it was WEDU by November" – I might do "Briefly called WFCE in the local press, it was known as WEDU by November". Also:
  • If it was you would have probably added it, but I must ask: do we know what WFCE meant/where the name came from?
    • If I had to guess, probably from the name of the applicant with some letters transposed (Florida West Coast Educational). But I cannot say that.
  • Wikilink NBC.
  • I think "Over the course of 1959" can be "Over the course of the year" per the previous sentence, to clear up redundancy.
  • "The staff grew from 11 people to 38 and later 50" – do we know in what years these were?
    • Done — the references are from 1962 and 1963.
Educational competition and a budget crisis
  • Wikilink VHF.
  • Ref 42 should come after the ). punctuation.
    • No, it specifically covers the items in the parentheses (replacement of NET with PBS).
      • @Sammi Brie: That makes sense for the other parenthesised sentence in this article, but this one uses a full stop at the end, and the following sentence starting with Instead is capitalised, so I think it is awkward to write it in this manner as subsequently the unparenthesised part of the sentence is actually uncited. In this context I think it is better clarity-wise to then have refs 42 and 43 next to one another here, then 43 cited again for the following sentence.
Color programming and new facilities
  • I think we can wikilink Florida's Department of Education.
    • It is wikilinked on first mention earlier.
  • The sentence starting "New equipment, poorly maintained" concludes with a semi-colon but the following sentence is capitalised.
Channel swap attempt
  • "enjoy access to almost all of the same viewers it had on cable systems; and it would" – should be a comma.
New ventures and new fiscal battles
  • I think you should rephrase "The task of righting the ship" as an idiom that a lot of people may not understand.
  • Mention Cincinnati as being in Ohio.

(The other sections are all good).

Spotcheck

Passes on the refs I checked. Though:

  • "the single largest contribution in station history" – I cannot see where the source mentions this; do you mean to say "the single largest contribution in the station's history"?
    • Yes, but this would be a common phrasing. I changed it for clarity though.
Apologies for the wait; over to you, you know the drill. :) ❧ LunaEatsTuna (talk), proudly editing since 2018 (and just editing since 2017) – posted at 19:52, 10 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
@LunaEatsTuna: Made all changes. Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 20:55, 10 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
@LunaEatsTuna Went ahead and restructured the first mention of PBS to get it out of that parenthetical. Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 01:28, 11 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
Looks good! I am happy with all of the other changes as well and thanks for the explanations. Happy now to pass this article for GA status. Congrats! ❧ LunaEatsTuna (talk), proudly editing since 2018 (and just editing since 2017) – posted at 06:00, 11 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.