Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
// request.cf · coarse context
A page that knows where it met you.
Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.
A fact from WBHP appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 10 December2008, and was viewed approximately 671 times (disclaimer). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio Stations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of radio stations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Radio StationsWikipedia:WikiProject Radio StationsTemplate:WikiProject Radio StationsRadio station
Latest comment: 10 months ago5 comments5 people in discussion
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move reviewafter discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
WBHP (800 AM) → WBHP – This article was recently renamed to reflect a call change following the closure of former parent station WBHP (1230 AM). However, per the naming conventions in this topic area, frequency disambiguation is normally only used for defunct stations (which is true for the 1230 AM station, but not the 800 AM station). It is, in fact, more standard (when possible) for the current station to be at the base title, with a hatnote pointing to the earlier station. (I had intended for this article to be moved, at least in the short term, to WBHP (AM)WBHP (AM), but that was deemed to be too ambiguous under interpretations that did not take into account NC-BC.) As this is apparently controversial, an RM is required. WCQuidditch☎✎17:55, 30 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
Support I am so sorry, I was not particularly familiar with this but saw the partially completed move so completed it then got another comment so moved it again. Support per the arguments put forward by nom. Casablanca 🪨(T)19:33, 30 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
Support This is how WP:NCBC is interpreted. Casablanca Rock, don't be ashamed; this is a topic area that has very quirky rules on how to title pages compared to other naming conventions, and this is one reason why. It is not uncommon to have to process KXXX → KYYY and KWWW → KXXX as moves at the same time. This is also why pages that are call sign–titled should be linked to directly with no intervening redirects. If you ever have questions in the future about NCBC, do not hesitate to talk to me. Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 01:58, 31 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
