Talk:WASP-13
Add topicLatest comment: 14 years ago by Tyrol5 in topic GA Review
 | WASP-13 has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:WASP-13/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: I will review this article against the good article criteria. Tyrol5 [Talk] 20:44, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
Nicely written article, an interesting read.
- Is it reasonably well written?
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- I'm having issues with reference #1; the abstract does not appear to supply cited information. – I've found the PDF article
Resolved
- I'm having issues with reference #1; the abstract does not appear to supply cited information.
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- I've no reason to suspect OR, but I can't seem to find cited info in ref #1. – I've Found the PDF article Resolved
- I've no reason to suspect OR, but I can't seem to find cited info in ref #1.
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- N/A; No images used in article.
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
Article, overall, looks good to me. Will wait until I hear from you on the journal reference. On hold for seven days. Tyrol5 [Talk] 20:59, 26 August 2011 (UTC)- I've found the PDF and resolved the issue. Everything looks good; glad to list as good article. Tyrol5 [Talk] 21:42, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
- Pass or Fail: