Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2408825d9afae97

Jump to content

Talk:WAQI

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 11 months ago by Pokelego999 in topic GA review

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Z1720 (talk) 21:33, 9 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

5x expanded by Sammi Brie (talk). Self-nominated at 17:28, 15 June 2022 (UTC).Reply

    General: Article is new enough and long enough
    Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
    Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
    QPQ: Done.

    Overall: y

    @Sammi Brie: The original hook is fine. I'm aware that hooks "that focus unduly on negative aspects of living individuals ... should be avoided", and think a version of ALT1 would be acceptable. For ALT1, is there a reason to use "politicians" rather than a more direct equivalent of, or the actual phrase, "state legislators"? I also think there are better ways to phrase ALT1, but if you're happy to stick with the original hook then no need to worry about that. "Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 15:06, 6 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

    • The use of both "parents" and "children" seems a bit complicated. I had in mind something along the lines "...that two state legislators got into a fight in the parking lot of Radio Mambí in Miami after the father of one politician insulted the other's father on the station?" but now I've written it down I'm not sure it's really an improvement. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 21:55, 6 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
    ALT1a: ... that two state representatives got into a fight in the parking lot of Miami's Radio Mambí after one's father insulted the other's on the air? Source: https://www.newspapers.com/clip/103795124/2-state-reps-duke-it-out-in-radio/
    Yes, I think so. Happy with the original hook and with ALT1a, with a slight preference for the latter. Thanks, Sammi Brie. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 08:48, 7 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

    GA review

    [edit]
    This review is transcluded from Talk:WAQI/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

    Nominator: Sammi Brie (talk · contribs) 16:59, 8 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

    Reviewer: Pokelego999 (talk · contribs) 02:42, 10 August 2025 (UTC)Reply


    Hitting this up as part of my GAN pledge. Will leave comments soon hopefully. @Sammi Brie:

    Six GA Criteria

    [edit]

    1. Article is well-written. Very minimal mistakes if any at all.

    2. No OR, all info is cited in the article.

    3. Coverage is broad in depth and focus. Shows multiple aspects of the subject.

    4. Article appears neutral, and does not appear to hold a significantly negative nor positive stance on the subject.

    5. Article appears stable. Does not appear to have had any major vandalism occur.

    6. Article uses one fair use image with proper rationale.

    Lead

    [edit]

    -Why is the amount of watts in the lead relevant? Mostly asking since I'm not super duper familiar with this.

      • Power is very meaningful, especially in AM radio. 50,000 watts is the maximum for a U.S. AM radio station.

    -"The history of today's WAQI" feels like it could become dated given it's saying "today". I feel you could just axe the today part.

    -"It was acquired by George B. Storer in 1944 after a controversial acquisition that resulted in government scrutiny, moving to Miami the next year." reword since it implies the government scrutiny moved to Miami the following year.

    -"It generally aired an adult music format after the 1950s." This is a bit unclear to me. Was it primarily airing adult music, or was it using adult music as part of a different format? Reword if possible.

    • When we use "format", it means generally the entire broadcast day.

    WFTL in Fort Lauderdale

    [edit]

    -Looks good

    WGBS

    [edit]

    -"as WGBS-FM" was the simulcast called this, or was this the station name? It is unclear.

    • Reworded. (Fun fact, that article is a DYK of mine)

    -"beautiful music/middle of the road" Reword per MOS:SLASH.

    WAQI

    [edit]

    -"when the call letters WGBS disappeared from Miami radio after 40 years to make way for WAQI." This bit feels a bit overly dramatic to me, and feels like it's trying to illicit emotion. I'd remove it.

    -"Whereas Jefferson-Pilot, competing for English-language listeners, wanted a signal with better Broward coverage, Mambisa got a bonus of import to its work: one of the best Miami signals into Cuba." This whole sentence feels very confusing to me. Not sure it's really needed when it can just be summed up as "They wanted a strong radio signal".

    -Could it be clarified what a physical plant is? It hasn't been clarified prior barring a name drop, and I'm unsure of why it's so important.

    -"This fact was not lost on the Cuban government." The following sentence does not indicate Cuba actually did anything about it, so I'm not sure why it's here.

      • Reworded.

    -"The irony was that the main interference generated was not within Cuba, where station officials claimed to have a large audience, but in Florida, where high-power Radio Rebelde and WQBA signals clashed." Whose irony? This feels very opionated and if its cited to a source cite it to them instead of having it in your own words.

      • Reworded to attribute Pérez Roura.

    -"Cuba's exile community, close to the families of political prisoners and organized opposition movements while offering community service and cultural programming." I'd split this, it feels like it's jamming too many points into one sentence.

      • Split

    -"In 2000, Republican politicians Renier Díaz de la Portilla and Carlos Lacasa engaged in an early-morning fistfight in the station's parking lot after Lacasa's father insulted Díaz de la Portilla's father on the air. Lacasa received a bloody nose, and when host Martha Flores asked on the air for someone to call the police, the city's 911 system was swamped with calls." This whole bit doesn't seem too relevant and just feels like WP:TRIVIA since it doesn't really impact anything else and feels tangential.

    • This was actually the DYK hook when it ran in 2022. I think it's relevant because it shows the real impact Mambi had—and has—in this community.

    Spotcheck

    [edit]

    Sources checked: 57, 58, 99, 43, 40, 35, 24, 20, 90, 69. I'm admittedly unsure if we really need 99 given it's a PRIMARY citation, and it's unclear if DeSantis's advertising had an actual impact or not.

    • [99] contains the ad copy and translations for the quote.

    Overall

    [edit]

    Ping me when the above are addressed. Looks solid so far but needs a little bit of work. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 16:31, 10 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

    @Sammi Brie responded. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 21:13, 10 August 2025 (UTC)Reply