Talk:W91
Add topicLatest comment: 18 years ago by Georgewilliamherbert
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Is this info good to have on the internet? Don't we all feel smart, butting this info out... oh, we are so smart arn't we? Is this how we show how tough, and mocho, and smart we are? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.142.93.27 (talk • contribs)
- Please see The Nuclear Weapons Archive, which has far more info, in far more detail, including the detailed physics and engineering. And has been on the internet in some form or another for 15 or more years. Don't be paranoid about Wikipedia coverage on this topic... Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 02:50, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class military history articles
- Start-Class military science, technology, and theory articles
- Military science, technology, and theory task force articles
- Start-Class weaponry articles
- Weaponry task force articles
- Start-Class North American military history articles
- North American military history task force articles
- Start-Class United States military history articles
- United States military history task force articles