Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a23298cfba206bf7

Jump to content

Talk:Vulva

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 13 days ago by Qwertyxp2000 in topic Infobox caption change?

Division between human and non-human vulvas

[edit]

I suggest the article to be divided in two articles, one concerning vulvas in humans and another vulvas in general. Although this page starts with "vulvas are mammalian sexual organs", it then drifts out to talk only about human vulvas.

I suspect most people who access this article are interested in reading about human vulvas, so it would be better to split it into two articles rather than reformulating this article to be a general overview on vulvas in the animal kingdom. Morgueço | Morgueco (he/him) 🦇 🇧🇷 talkcontributions 02:43, 11 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

See Talk:Vagina for an extensive discussion that concluded this should not be done. I suspect the reasoning is similar enough to carry over here. Jtrevor99 (talk) 05:04, 11 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
While it didn't reach consensus, a majority of the people on discussion you linked was clearly in favor of splitting the article up anyway. The main issue seemed that there was not enough content to make a separate article. Even a simple sticky on top of the discussion page of "we will split those two articles when there is enough content for a split, please contribute to the 'Other animals' section" would go a long way to gather enough small contributions over time to justify a split.
Anyway, I wouldn't be able to contribute much because I don't know that much about zoology or medicine. My area of interest, and the reason I advocate for a split, is gender studies. It's very inadequate for nowadays' standards that an article on vagina or vulvas describes only women as having either, and it goes both ways for the penis article. Things get more complex in that trans women may have a vulva but not a vagina after a vaginoplasty, etc.
Splitting the articles between humans and other animals and then figuring out how to write the human-centered articles is just less of a headache than try to figure out how to respectfully address those differences. It is already hard enough to figure out how to word everything when comparing cis and trans/intersex people, see the discussion page for Woman for an example, much less figure out how to write those differences respectfully when you put animals in the mix, who are still described with the "female" and "male" denominators but have no concept of gender whatsoever. Morgueço | Morgueco (he/him) 🦇 🇧🇷 talkcontributions 08:19, 11 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 2 April 2026

[edit]

Add File:Vulva_swollen_pregnant.jpg to the pregnancy section Joeblow23456789 (talk) 20:15, 2 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

 Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before posting an edit request. Umby 🌕🐶 (talk) 10:15, 3 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 18 May 2026

[edit]

I believe there is a grammatical error or maybe just a confusing sentence in the Structure -> Vestibule subsection. The first sentence currently reads:

"The area between the labia minora where the vaginal introitus and the urinary meatus ... are located is the vestibule."

The phrase “between the labia minora where…” is difficult to parse because “between” seems to require a second object, which it does not have. I'm not sure what the original author intended, perhaps it was "within" since the labia minora are a circular structure. (i.e. "the area within the labia minora surrounding the ...")

This sentence is already quite busy, so I think adding a simple "and" after "labia minora" would be an improvement but not a great overall solution. I think the sentence should be rewritten. Whatever the solution, I just wanted to point it out. ~2026-30233-15 (talk) 17:13, 19 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for pointing that out. I have attempted to improve the parsing and readability of that sentence. Jtrevor99 (talk) 18:16, 19 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

The Depiction of a Human Vulva

[edit]

I think we shouldn’t be depicting human vulva’s, as this site is exposed to children and no sex organ should be viewed by a child. Another article about male functions is used with an animal reproductive organ. I suggest the same is done to keep children safe. ~2026-33942-13 (talk) 19:53, 8 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Read WP:NOTCENSORED. Jtrevor99 (talk) 21:59, 8 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Infobox caption change?

[edit]

Since the article is about the vulva in all mammals, not only humans (but primarily about humans), should the infobox caption be changed to mention "in humans"? As in...

Natural variation in vulvar appearance -> Natural variation in vulvar appearance in humans

(Not sure if it's "in humans" or "on humans", but hopefully you get the idea) Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 13:58, 16 July 2026 (UTC)Reply