Talk:Volume (computing)
Add topic | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | The content of Volume serial number was merged into Volume (computing) on 7 August 2021. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. For the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Mount Points
[edit]"Mount points have been left at defaults." What does that mean in regard to the following table ? There´s no column header, that says "mount point."
merge
[edit]There is a link here about a merge with volume serial number, but there is no discussion here. I think merge is fine, but with one complication. OS/360 and successors use the volume serial number to keep track of disks and tapes, even NL (unlabeled)tapes. In that case, the volume serial number is only written on a sticker attached to the reel. I suspect that this defintion doesn't apply to other systems. OS/360 will request that a tape be mounted, if specified as NL will verify that the tape actually does not have a label, and then allow it to be used. One thing to know, if the tape is blank (not previously used) it will run off the reel searching for a label. In any case, NL tapes should be included in the discussion. Gah4 (talk) 08:23, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
Merge completed; no objections to the addition of new material in situ. Klbrain (talk) 09:56, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
Example: "Any of these can be called a "drive"." Really?
[edit]AFAICT (disk) drives should be the physical storage hardware, and thus only "Hard Disk 1" and "Hard Disk 2" are drives. -- 林博仁 (talk) 05:46, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- Well, since about the beginning of USB flash sticks they have been called drives. I suppose it makes some sense, especially in the days of removable disks, for the hardware to be a drive (with or without a disk pack mounted) and volume to be the logical descriptor. The idea of logical volume distinguishes it from a physical volume. Gah4 (talk) 07:14, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
can still be accessed with an operating system's logical interface
[edit]WRT "Although a volume might be different from a physical drive, it can still be accessed with an operating system's logical interface." To me that is nonsense. It implies that _because_ a volume might be different than a physical drive (which BTW it is!) it is accessed with an OS's logical interface. First, what is an OS's logical interface? Second, what about it _not_ being a physical drive makes it notable that you access it with an OS's logical interface? I think the author is trying to say something interesting and notable, but IDK what. Stevebroshar (talk) 17:42, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
- I removed that passage since it made no sense. Stevebroshar (talk) 17:59, 29 December 2025 (UTC)