Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a25a3b2f0b13c125

Jump to content

Talk:Visakha

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 7 years ago by Wikiman5676 in topic Century

Expansion

[edit]

I will try to expand this when i have time. The Tripitaka describes Visakha as the biggest patron of the Buddha along with Anathapindika and is thus an important figure. However getting information on her will be hard as female disciples of the Buddha are overwhelmingly under covered in secondary sources. Wikiman5676 (talk) 00:55, 18 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

I remember seeing several studies on female figures in Theravada or early Buddhism on Google books. You might want to do a search there.--Farang Rak Tham (Talk) 06:06, 18 March 2018 (UTC)Reply


Century

[edit]

Are there any estimates as the the century she lived in? Or even a millenium? The lead states she lived in the times of Gautama Buddha (c. 563/480 – c. 483/400 BCE), so presumably she could be added to categories for people living in 5th/6th century BC? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:26, 28 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

The Buddhist scriptures are essentially the only historical documents that describe her, so whenever historians date the time of the historic Buddha. If Gautama Buddha lived 5th/6th century she probably lived 5th/4th century. as she was seven years old when the Buddha was middle aged. so she lived a few decades past the historic Buddha's death. Wikiman5676 (talk) 01:38, 29 August 2018 (UTC)Reply
I've added the category for Category:5th-century BC Indian people, do you think that's ok? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:47, 29 August 2018 (UTC)Reply
That sounds fine to me. Wikiman5676 (talk) 02:04, 30 August 2018 (UTC)Reply