Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a25e2bee485526b9

Jump to content

Talk:Virial coefficient

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 12 years ago by GreenReaper in topic Startups

Cross virial coefficients

[edit]

What about cross virial coefficients? 128.12.20.32 21:16, 20 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

Ref on this topic: Witold Warowny, The second cross virial coefficients of gaseous mixtures, PWN - Polish Scientific Publishers, 1979--193.231.19.53 (talk) 11:04, 21 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Journal articles (J Chem Phys) on mixtures virial coefficients--193.231.19.53 (talk) 11:52, 7 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Compressibility factor and virial coefficients - relation to intermolecular forces

[edit]

from usertalk Dirac66 : Regarding the insight on intermolecular forces, some more details regarding the relation of intermolecular forces to virial coefficients would be useful. --188.26.22.131 (talk) 10:04, 17 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

They probably would be useful, if you want to try to find the information in a textbook. Dirac66 (talk) 01:52, 18 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
It seems that there are inconsistencies between various sources/textbooks regarding this topic.Some give the next formula for compressibility factor and others for the second virial coefficient:

or

where varphi is the potential of the forces.

Which one holds?--188.26.22.131 (talk) 14:51, 19 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

There is clearly an error in the second formula because the second virial coefficient which is usually written B2 should have dimensions of volume. The first one may be right if you have found it in reliable sources - I am not an expert in this. Dirac66 (talk) 01:29, 20 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for your answer. Do you happen to know some wikieditor who has an expertise in this topic?--188.26.22.131 (talk) 09:55, 23 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
Why don't you believe the present article? It says:
(Dimension volume)
--P.wormer (talk) 08:42, 7 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Startups

[edit]

I came here expecting to hear about the concept in startup methodology. Needs more non-physics! GreenReaper (talk) 20:18, 4 June 2014 (UTC)Reply